LETTER FOR YOUR VETERINARIAN
Please consider sending this to your vet if you are concerned about your right to own and breed dogs.
Below you will find an example letter you may send. You can "copy and paste" this into your favorite text editing software or use one of the files here, which are the same letter but in formats you may find easier to use.
(Text of letter follows)
(Date)
Dear (your veterinarian),
As a concerned pet owner/breeder/exhibitor, I am extremely worried that in just
a few short years, I will no longer be able to enjoy life with my pets. Under
the guise of “animal welfare,” animal rights groups are systematically chipping
away my right to own pets and enjoy the human-animal bond.
There is a huge difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights.
Animal Welfare is a philosophy that advocates that people who keep and utilize
animals have a moral responsibility to assure their well-being, and to protect
them from abuse and unnecessary suffering. Animal Rights is a philosophy that
advocates animals should be viewed as legal persons, not property, and that
they should not be used in any way.
Groups such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and HSUS
(Humane Society of the United States, no direct affiliation with local humane
societies) conduct major political lobbying at the state and federal levels and
spend millions of dollars annually to promote their agenda and to elect
candidates that favor their agenda. That agenda, while couched in terms of
animal welfare, is, in many cases, designed to restrict and eliminate a pet
owner’s right to own animals.
Eliminating the right to own pets will severely affect your veterinary
practice...
Animal Rights organizations spend millions of dollars a year lobbying politicians.
Breed restrictions, early spay and neuter, crop and dock bans, are all examples
of legislation which limits and eliminates pet ownership, community by
community, state by state. These groups feel pet ownership, livestock, food
animals, hunting, medical research, zoos, circuses, rodeos, horse shows, dog
shows, cat shows, bird shows, guide dogs, service dogs, police dogs, and search
and rescue dogs are all “exploitation” of animals and attempt to end them. They
also chip away at the rights of pet owners and their veterinarians to determine
the proper veterinary treatment of their pets’ health and welfare.
Laws banning ear cropping, tail docking, debarking, declawing, or enforcing
early spay and neuter protocols attempt to dictate how you practice medicine.
These are surgical procedures that should be decided on a medical case by case
basis in the best interest of the animal patient, between you, the
veterinarian, and me, the pet owner - not a politician.
I believe that veterinary medical decisions should be made by veterinarians and
pet owners, not by politicians…
Animal Rights groups encourage politicians to enact both drastic and seemingly
insignificant changes to current legislation. They play to our emotional, not
factual based decisions.
The “owner” vs. “guardian” issue is a perfect example. While on the surface,
replacing the term “owner” with “guardian” in legislation seems to be
innocuous, kind-hearted, and a gentler term to use, in reality, it takes away a
pet owner’s property rights to own, breed, and even provide veterinary care for
their pet. Once a pet owner is deemed a “guardian,” it opens the door for third
parties to step in, on behalf of the pet, and override decisions made on behalf
of the pet, including veterinary care.
Imagine having to get permission from not only the pet owner, but a third party
“guardian” whenever you recommend a medical procedure. Imagine having your
medical protocol questioned in the local courts when a “guardian” decides to
intercede and files an injunction on behalf of the pet to prohibit your
recommended course of treatment.
Continuing to allow Animal Rights groups to influence local legislation is
harmful to our rights as pet owners and your rights to determine how you
practice veterinary medicine.
This directly affects your ability to both practice veterinary medicine and
earn a living. Without a pet population, veterinary medicine would be severely
limited, if not totally destroyed.
As a veterinarian, and a respected member of our community, your involvement is
crucial in the fight against anti-pet legislation.
Two great sources of information on how to battle this type of legislation are
the NAIA (National Animal Interest Alliance) and the American Kennel Club.
The NAIA (www.naiaonline.org) is an association of business, agricultural,
scientific, and recreational interests dedicated to promoting animal welfare,
supporting responsible animal use, and strengthening the bond between humans
and animals. Their members are pet owners, dog and cat clubs, obedience clubs,
and rescue groups, as well as breeders, trainers, veterinarians, research
scientists, farmers, fishermen, hunters, and wildlife biologists. Through the
NAIA and the NAIA Trust (www.naiatrust.org) whose mission is to promote the
welfare of animals, strengthen the human-animal bond and safeguard the rights
of responsible animal owners, enthusiasts and professionals through education,
legislation and the courts. Their web sites are filled with facts, figures, and
sample talking points to help you become an expert advocate.
The American Kennel Club (AKC) Government Relations Department
(www.akc.org/canine_legislation) is dedicated to protecting the rights of all
dog owners, recognizing that advocacy works best when those who are directly
affected by the legislation take the lead in working with policymakers. With
125 years of experience in the study and welfare of dogs, the AKC is a leading
expert on responsible dog ownership, care, well-being, and public policy issues
that pertain to dog ownership. The primary role of the AKC in the area of
canine public policy is educational and informational. There is a wealth of
information available to you to support the fight against anti-dog legislation.
Animal Rights legislation affects all of us that love our pets. Not only does
it affect the pet owner, but the pet industry as a whole, including veterinary
medicine, groomers, trainers, pet stores, and breeders.
We can’t let the benefits of the human and animal bond be taken away from us.
We must all work together to preserve our life with animals. As pet owners, we
rely on you, our veterinarian, to be there for our pets’ medical needs, and to
counsel us on their health and well-being. We are already engaged in this
battle with the Animal Rights groups. We need your help!
Grass roots efforts at the local level are what win the battles against this
type legislation. Get involved. Go to your city or county commission meetings.
Facts and figures coming from you, the veterinarian, create far greater impact
than from pet owners alone. After all, most city commissioners, county
commissioners, and legislators own pets, and trust their veterinarian. You are
the expert on veterinary care. They will listen to you.
Best regards,
(your name)
HSUS UNDER INVESTIGATION
http://humanewatch.org/index.php/site/post/congressmen_sniff_out_hsus_lobbying/
http://tinyurl.com/29hn79p
Jul 09 2010
Congressmen Sniffing Out HSUS Lobbying
Two Members of the U.S. Congress are hot on HSUS’s trail for what may be
excessive lobbying, and the IRS is apparently taking a hard look.
Here’s a little background: In March we spoke with attorney Frank Losey,
who is independently leading a campaign to get the IRS to investigate
whether HSUS’s wide-ranging lobbying activities violate its 501(c)(3)
charity status. As of March, his effort had generated over 4,000
grassroots letters to the IRS, and hundreds or letters to Members of
Congress.
And the effort has apparently been yielding some serious fruit.
In a letter from March 23 that's just surfacing this morning,
Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) wrote to IRS Commissioner Douglas
Shulman to convey his concerns about HSUS’s lobbying activities.
Specifically, Luetkemeyer singles out the apparent conflict of interest
in Michael Markarian’s role as head of HSUS’s lobbying arm (the Humane
Society Legislative Fund) and his positions as HSUS Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer. Luetkemeyer also notes HSUS’s own admission
that it “helped to pass…a total of 470 new state laws in the last 7
years.”...
Link to AKC’s Congressional Newsletter
http://www.akc.org/pdfs/canine_legislation/in_session/spring_2010.pdf
THE OHIO COMPROMISE
7/7/2010
7:59:00 PM
The Ohio Compromise
By ANDY VANCE
Agri Broadcasting Network
http://tinyurl.com/252kw2t
"The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other
(guy) die for his." - General George S. Patton, Jr.
Many of us made the mistake of thinking we were going to war, proudly
carrying the battle standard for farm families, consumer rights, truth,
justice, and the American way. Staring back across the mud and the blood
were a group of idealists one Ohio farm leader popularly referred to as
"radical anti-meat terrorists."
The problem is we weren't really fighting terrorists; we were fighting a
sophisticated regime of well-funded mercenaries intent on destroying us
from within. We thought we were fighting for General Patton across
Western Europe, when really we were fighting the Cold War. The good guys
blinked, and last week Ohio farm leaders brokered a compromise with the
Humane Society of the United States.
General George Patton is one of my favorite historical figures. The
greatest wartime General in modern history, Patton was as famous for his
efficiency in defeating Nazis as for his inability to navigate politics.
Patton's writings are particularly applicable to the feelings of many
Ohio farmers following the "Ohio Compromise" between farm groups and
animal rights activists....
(view the entire article)
AKC RESPONSE TO FEDERAL PUPS BILL
|
[Thursday, July 22, 2010] |
|
The American Kennel Club and our Washington, D.C.-based advocacy team continue to closely monitor S. 3424/H.R. 5434, the federal Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety (PUPS) Act. There has been no official action on the bill since its introduction in late May. As previously reported, the 2010 PUPS bill seeks to expand federal regulation of dog breeders who breed and sell more than 50 puppies a year directly to consumers. This version is a significant improvement over previous versions, which focused on the number of dogs owned, regardless of what was bred or sold. This version would require the new category of breeders to abide by basic minimum standards of care and conditions and to abide by new performance-based exercise requirements. However, the AKC also has a number of serious concerns with the bill as introduced. Some of these concerns include:
We will continue to monitor this legislation vigilantly and to outline our concerns regarding PUPS legislation to appropriate members of Congress and staff. Given the issues that AKC and other responsible dog owner groups have raised, and that Congress will be in session for fewer than six weeks prior to the November elections, it is not likely that there will be action on PUPS in the near term. AKC will continue its education campaign with legislators and we will keep you up to date on any new developments. For more information about the PUPS bill view the links below:
|
© NEAA 1998-2010. All rights reserved.
All content on this website is protected under US Copyright Law and rights
belong to its owner. No content, including photos, graphics, text, or
other content
or intellectual property may be reproduced without prior written permission of
its owner.
Revised: July 24, 2010
Contact NEAA for more information.